Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Andrey Chepelev vs Luca Giacomini Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chepelev vs Giacomini analysis and find out who is favored!
Andrey Chepelev vs Luca Giacomini Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chepelev 1 - 0 Giacomini
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chepelev has won 46.61% of points on their second serve, while Giacomini has won 48.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chepelev, in recent form, has won 55.17% of their opponent's second serve points, while Giacomini has won 53.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.78% and 32.53% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chepelev has saved 57.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Giacomini has saved 56.99% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chepelev has won 64.38% of matches played (W/L 47/ 26), with Giacomini winning 57.75% (W/L 41/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chepelev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 383/ 244), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5). Giacomini has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 84/ 49), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Chepelev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 44/ 24), where as Giacomini has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.65% of matches (W/L 34/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chepelev winning 1 times and Giacomini being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Chepelev winning 2 and Giacomini winning 1. The last match between Chepelev and Giacomini was at the M15 Caslano, 25-08-2023, Quarterfinals, Clay with Andrey Chepelev getting the victory 7-5 3-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chepelev and Giacomini have played a deciding set 1 times, with Chepelev winning 1 times and Giacomini 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chepelev winning 0, and Giacomini 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chepelev has played against opponents with an average rank of 137.6 while Giacomini has played against players with an average rank of 165.18.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chepelev has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Giacomini has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chepelev has converted 54.41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Giacomini has converted 43.02% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
542
Rank
339
High
25
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
597
Rank
462
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
60% (391-257)
Career Total W/L
56% (201-157)
40% (4-6)
YTD W/L
46% (13-15)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Andrey Chepelev | Luca Giacomini |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:13:0 | 3:13:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (69/100) | 60% (58/97) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (39/69) | 66% (38/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (15/31) | 44% (17/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (6/16) | 45% (5/11) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (42/97) | 46% (46/100) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Luca Giacomini
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
46 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Andrey Chepelev | Luca Giacomini |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (4/6) | 46% (13/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (9/13) | 46% (27/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (92/99) | 49% (263/269) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 42% (5/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 2 | 15 |
| DFs per game | 0.45 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 54 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:12 | 1:43:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 187.36 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (426/624) | 67% (1151/1717) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (253/426) | 64% (736/1151) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (87/198) | 48% (273/566) |
| BPs Won% Total | 59% (32/54) | 43% (77/179) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (237/563) | 41% (690/1692) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 40% (4/6) | 50% (11/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (4/10) | 46% (13/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 100% (12/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 0% (12/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 6% (16/1) |
Andrey Chepelev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Andrey Chepelev
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
79%
(
64 of
81)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Noah Perfetti
78%
(
69 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Barnat
Player
Andrey Chepelev
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
38%
(
19 of
50)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Markus Molder
Player
Andrey Chepelev
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
David Fix
Player
Andrey Chepelev
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Timofei Derepasko
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Andrey Chepelev
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Samuil Konov
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Calvano
Player
Andrey Chepelev
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve %
61%
(
14 of
23)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
31
Total Points Won
8
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Ghouse Ali Faisal
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Luca Giacomini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Luca Giacomini
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Luca Giacomini
48%
(
30 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Giacomini
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
44 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luca Giacomini
Player
Adam Taylor
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Luca Giacomini
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Giacomini
Player
Gregor Ramskogler
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Giacomini
Player
Alessandro Pecci
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Luca Giacomini
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Giacomini
Player
Michiel De Krom
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Luca Giacomini
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Chepelev Vs Giacomini Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
